Friday Q&A. Why get married then?

18

Posted on : 07-30-2010 | By : Sadie Smythe | In : open marriage

Okay, I’ll admit – I didn’t receive this question, but it is a question that was asked by several people in response to yesterday’s piece on CNN by Christopher Ryan, entitled Monogamy unnatural for our sexy species, which you should read.

In fact, you can go read it now if you haven’t seen it yet. I’ll stay here and wait while ya do.

*whistles*

Ryan’s piece, as his title announces, essentially reports that monogamy is not a natural construct. Those of you who read me regularly know that I agree with this notion wholeheartedly. It is, in fact, a huge part of the reason why Hubby and I have an open marriage – because we felt too confined within the trappings of monogamy and ultimately believe it is a societal construct, and wholly unnatural. But Ryan, author of Sex at Dawn: The Prehistoric Origins of Modern Sexuality, uses historic, biological, and evolutionary considerations to back up his opinion, yet never discussing non-monogamy as a concept at all, which I believe strengthens his message and keeps from diluting it. His article is upfront, articulate, and succinct, and has (at this writing) garnered over 2,200 comments; many of which are full flaming, hating, ignorant drivel.

Of course.

I was struck by how many of the commenters offered nothing constructive or valuable as a retort, but instead just asked him the following ~

Well, then why get married in the first place?

Now, I understand that most people who pose that question to those of us who challenge the monogamy concept do so rhetorically. They don’t really want an answer; their question is actually intended to imply an oversimplified and dissenting opinion (one that is loaded with ignorance) on the information and opinion presented. But, I am going to answer it anyway.

Cuz I can.

People get married for many reasons -security, love and companionship probably being the top three- and those who have never been married before don’t always understand how difficult marriage is to maintain. I’ve said it before and I will say it again and again and again - marriage is work, work and more work.

—And I may not have said it before but I will say it now – every person should be afforded the opportunity to get married. Every. Person. Regardless of their sexual orientation. It is not our government’s (or the church’s) right to limit marriage to the heterosexual establishment that it is currently. If you agree, please sign the Human Rights Campaign’s petition for marriage equality.

But it isn’t until we have been married to or partnered with someone for a while that we realize the little shit that we couldn’t have foreseen – how the lust wears off, how tedious daily life can become, how quickly the things that we used to find quirky and cute about our partner become annoying beyond reason, how living with someone for a long period of time can make you feel like you aren’t an individual any longer, and how much work it takes to mitigate all of these things. Until we are married (or involved long-term) we just can’t know these things. Now of course there are wonderful, enjoyable, beautiful aspects of marriage. But the truth is that the sweet things are more difficult to appreciate unless you’ve done the work to clear out all the icky stuff that long-term partnering entails. And this is true whether you are practicing monogamy, non-monogamy … or whatever ogamy.

But we human beings get married because we are in love. Because we want to extend that love further. Because we want to have hospital visitation rights if our spouse becomes ill. Because we want family health insurance without having to validate our relationship in order to get it. Because we want a tax break. Because we want to have children and we want to give them the security that having two parents who have legally and/or spiritually committed to each other suggests. And this, of course, can and does suggest different things to different people. And it does not suggest that not marrying or otherwise publicly “committing” means that children wouldn’t have or feel security. It just means that a piece of paper and a memory of a ceremony might sometimes be the glue that holds a crumbling relationship together  - the “Dammit, I vowed to be with her until death do us part and I plan to honor that promise” glue.

Trust me on this. I speak from experience.

And that is why we might get married. We stay married for different reasons – tenacity, security, commitment, love – and we do so because despite all the problems that may arise, the fact is that loving someone long-term feels good. It feels safe and comfortable and substantial. Most married people will tell you that their love for each other has changed over the years – that it has evolved into a deeper, more centered place. Trudging tenaciously through tedium (and sweetness! there is the sweetness!) with someone has a way of irrevocably binding people together in a manner that encourages one to continue to push forward.

But none of this means that we can deny the fact that our biology is such that we are extremely sexual beings, plain and simple. Or that engaging in monogamous relationships is a natural course, as we have, as Ryan states, “been led to believe”. He says we are taught “that waning sexual passion in enduring marriages or sexual interest in anyone but their partner portend a failed relationship, when in reality these things often signify nothing more than that we are Homo sapiens.” It’s natural to want to sleep with other people. It’s a choice as to whether or not we do.

But just because I choose to structure my relationship as non-monogamous with my husband in part because of this instinct towards fucking around (among other reasons) does not mean that the idea of marriage is off the table, out of the question, or otherwise non-negotiable. I chose to marry for the reasons above – love, security, and companionship – and I stay married because of those reasons plus a desire to uphold my commitment.

Besides, I really can’t imagine living my life without Hubby.

So, that’s why we get married in the first place. I don’t think any of us who agree with Ryan that monogamy is unnatural think everyone should go out and start fucking around because that’s what we as animals are meant to do. But I do believe thoughtful investigations such as his should be noted, considered, digested and mulled over with an open mind. Because this is the way that tolerance for alternative relationships is built, and this is necessary. Because what those of us who are married (or parntered) decide to do once we get into the partnership is fully up to us to decide.

And then it becomes our very own DIY project on a very large scale.

Got a question for Friday Q & A? Email me!

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Tumblr
  • email

Comments (18)

I’m beginning more and more to subscribe to this line of thought. It’s so not what I was raised with nor is it something my husband would ever consider with more than contempt…still, while this distrubs me and begs a certain amount of dialogue down the road with the ensuing fallout…”cuz i can” added the laugh I needed when I consider all the implications…and GAH are there.

I don’t have very much to add to this.

In the end, it’s just about being open. In a marriage you formalize certain commitments to each other. Maybe there will be other lovers in the mix, maybe not. To me the point is to not have unrealistic expectations that only cause hurt.

Be who/what you are and face your demons.

Hear, hear! Excellent post!!! I totally agree. I just watched Episode 1 of This Emotional Life on Netflix play it now, it’s a PBS series about happiness. The host Dan Gilbert states, “Human happiness is based on healthy relationships more than any other factor.”

Healthy relationships require open and honest communication. A lot of people are afraid to tell their partner that they desire other people.

Most married people cope with their desires by cheating, suffering in silent resentment, or getting divorced. THERE ARE OTHER OPTIONS. As you well know. :) Thank you for spreading the word!

Unfortunately, it’s going to be a long time before society accepts the notion that sex and love can and should be ideas that can co-exist separately. People will always feel insecure and threatened by their spouse being sexually attracted to another, despite the fact that it has nothing to do with love or security or any other key notion that marriage should be built upon. Humans are just not wired to only be sexually attracted to one person, and repressing those desires just leads to resentment and unhappiness.

Great post, articulate and beautiful wording. You stated a lot of what I think/feel about this subject. Awesome, awesome read. Thank you.

I married Sadie to save her from indentured servitude, a ruthless drug cartel and so she could get her green card. Or possibly it was because she was the only woman I had ever met who I could imagine actually wanting to spend the rest of my life with.

Now twenty six years after meeting her and almost fourteen years after marrying her, I still wouldn’t choose anyone else to spend the tedious, trying moments of marriage with because the sweetness of who she is and the depth of our relationship are incomparable and irreplaceable to me.

If you just read this post or any of the others on this blog, you’re surely aware of how brilliant and thoughtful Sadie is and that is only a small part of why I consider myself to be one of the most fortunate men in the world to have her as my companion.

All of that makes the choice to see and have sex with other people one that feels good both when we’re out and when we come home.

Love you, baby. Always.

Very well said and very well put! Thanks for the link to the article.

Well put Sadie!

Thanks for plugging our book and for luring me to your wonderful site. One of the distinctions we’re hoping (some) people will learn to recognize from reading our book, your posts here, and similar material, is that between passion of the soul and passion of the body. If your marriage is based upon the former, as yours clearly is, the latter is no threat. In fact, you can play with it like a pussy cat. If your marriage is based on the latter, there’s little hope over the long term. Most people don’t get that, but it’s great that you and Johnny Pseudonym do.

Obviously as a species, we are capable of monogamy. And many people enjoy it and are willing and able to sustain it. But what’s most important is what the two people inside the relationship or marriage choose for themselves. Classic monogamy is only one of many options in this modern age. As long as what they do is agreed on by both sides and as long as those choices don’t adversely affect any children of the marriage then it’s really nobody’s business. Marriage is supposed be a cornerstone of stability for civilization. So however the two people choose to keep their marriage stable is irrelevant as it’s safe, legal, and consensual. It’s not for everyone but nothing ever is.

Great post, Sadie! I’m about halfway through the book myself and over and over I find myself nodding or even saying “YES!” out loud. It’s being told that all these things we’ve been feeling are perfectly normal, and it’s alright. Things we so desperately want to hear.

Planning to review it on the Swingset when I’m done!

Sadie,

This post makes such a beautiful argument for marriage. I don’t have a marriage that can be open, but my frustration with that does not invalidate all the rest. Thank you for making me appreciate (again) what I do have.

Penny

@JohnnyPseudonym

No husband could say it better

I clicked on Ryan’s article the other day and found myself nodding my head in agreement as I read it. Then I got to the comments and was dumbfounded. Of course, I shouldn’t have been surprised :-/

I REALLY like this post Sadie!

We need another word for what “marriage” has become. Marriage came to be as a religious practice, yes, but even moreso as a promise between two people — one male and one female — that they would raise children together to help ensure the continued survival of the species. This is also why we as a culture emphasize monogamy — a stable set of parents is easily the best situation for raising children.

In modern culture, “marriage” has become so many different things to so many different people. Obviously, homosexual couples cannot have their own children (adoption notwithstanding, but that’s an issue all to itself.) Likewise, a number of heterosexual couples get married intending to never have their own children. Then there are those who wish to live a long-term relationship with more than one other person. Under the reasoning I gave, neither of these groups should ever be married. It is my opinion — and I would assume one shared with most of your readers — that these people still deserve to have their ceremony and to be “married.”

What a great resource!

This is super interesting and reeeaaaally opened my mind to your side of the story. I didn’t judge people before who were in open relationships, but I also didn’t understand them. I think it’s becoming clearer and clearer.

- Disco

Thanks, y’all. I am glad to make a nice statement on marriage and long-term commitment, since I know I’ve given so many impressions that I think it can be a real bitch ;) I believe its an arrangement that people choose for various reasons and that it’s important on many different levels. But as you know, I also believe that the way it’s navigated is up to the people involved, but all too often, the partners end up traveling in opposite directions because of a lack of willingness to be upfront and honest about desires and needs. I also think fear plays into it sometimes. I can’t tell you how many people I know that are just downright afraid to share an aspect of their sexuality with their partners for fear that they will be judged.

Hmm… I feel another blog post coming on.

Thanks everyone!!!!

xo~Sadie

Post a comment

*